Somewhere in America right now, a guy is photographing his kitchen counter. Nineteen bottles. Three different "focus" blends. A longevity stack he can't pronounce. Turmeric gummies next to ashwagandha next to something called "cognitive support complex."
He posts it to Instagram. Caption: "The stack."
He has no idea if half of it works. Neither does his doctor. And neither does the $200 billion industry selling it to him.
The global dietary supplement market hit $203 billion in 2025 and is projected to reach $400-460 billion by 2034 (Precedence Research). The product count has exploded from roughly 4,000 in 1994 to over 100,000 today (NY Dept of State). Three-quarters of American adults take something. Among older adults, nearly a quarter of those 60 and older take four or more supplements daily (CDC NHANES).
Yet here's the uncomfortable truth the industry doesn't advertise: only about 21% of supplement users have a confirmed nutritional deficiency (American Osteopathic Association). The rest are buying expensive insurance policies against problems they may not have, using products that may not work, in combinations that may actually conflict.
The FDA doesn't require pre-market approval. Labels can be misleading. "Proprietary blends" obscure actual doses. And the apps trying to help? They're all building the same rickety intelligence layer from scratch.
Which is exactly where the heist lives.
The Opportunity Nobody Has Packaged
Open your app store and search "supplement tracker." You'll find a graveyard of similar ideas: FitReelix, Supplements AI, SuppTrack, Wholeness AI, Prove It, Nutrient Wise, SuppCo. They all promise AI-powered planning, barcode scanning, and smart scheduling.
Read the reviews. The pattern is brutal and consistent. Users love the concept. They hate the execution. Missing products. Weak databases. Incomplete intelligence. Aggressive paywalls guarding mediocre features.
Every single one of these apps is rebuilding the same backend brain badly. They're maintaining fragile product databases, interpreting science with skeleton crews, and bolting on AI copy to feel smarter than they are.
Meanwhile, the actual infrastructure exists. The NIH's Dietary Supplement Label Database catalogs information from over 200,000 supplement labels—ingredients, doses, claims—continuously updated and publicly accessible (NIH ODS). The Office of Dietary Supplements maintains exhaustive fact sheets on vitamins, minerals, botanicals, and probiotics. Examine.com has spent fourteen years systematically analyzing evidence for 800+ interventions.
The raw materials are sitting there. Nobody has assembled them into a developer-friendly, neutral truth layer delivered as drop-in APIs.
The thesis: Don't build another supplement app. Build the Supplement Truth Graph—an API that turns any product label or stack into evidence scores, dose validation, interaction flags, and plain-English explanations. Then license that brain to everyone else.
You're not competing with FitReelix. You're selling to them. You're Stripe for supplements. The plumbing everyone rents so they can focus on their actual product.
The Incumbents—And Why They Leave a Gap
Before you dismiss this as occupied territory, understand who's already here and why they haven't solved the problem.
Natural Medicines / NatMed Pro (TRC Healthcare) is the 800-pound gorilla for clinicians. They've built ~1,200+ detailed monographs covering 300,000+ supplements and natural products, with interaction checking, pregnancy/lactation safety, and patient handouts. Kaiser uses them. Duke Medical Library recommends them. They're the authoritative resource for evidence-based supplement information in clinical settings.
But NatMed Pro is optimized for hospitals, universities, and large provider organizations. Their interfaces serve clinicians, not indie developers. Their pricing and licensing assume institutional buyers, not startups building consumer apps. They've never exposed a self-service API with free dev tiers and Stripe-style documentation.
SUPP.AI (AI2) has built a supplement-drug interaction knowledge graph by mining 22 million biomedical articles, extracting ~60,000 interactions with ~195,000 evidence sentences. It's serious research infrastructure. But it's a searchable academic tool, not a commercial API positioned for consumer wellness products, and it's focused primarily on interactions rather than full stack reasoning.
The gap remains: Neither player offers a neutral, developer-first API that consumer apps, telehealth startups, and fitness platforms can drop in with minimal friction. Neither provides stack-level reasoning that answers "is this 14-product regimen coherent?" in milliseconds. Neither has built the opinionated "keep / adjust / ditch" layer that coaches and consumers actually want.
The clinical world is served. The developer world is not.
Why This Market Is Begging for a BS Detector
Several forces are colliding at exactly the right moment.
1. Massive, Compounding Demand
The global supplement market is growing 7-9% annually, driven by aging populations, chronic disease concerns, and wellness culture. North America alone will add roughly $28-64 billion in value by the early 2030s (Technavio). People are scared, getting older, and willing to pay for anything that promises an edge.
2. Intentionally Soft Regulation
Under DSHEA (1994), supplements don't require pre-market FDA approval. Labels ship first; regulators react later. That's created a landscape where FDA warning letters pile up every quarter—misleading claims, spiked ingredients, manufacturing violations—while 100,000+ SKUs continue competing for shelf space with minimal accountability (FDA Warning Letters).
3. Evidence Exists, But It's Buried
The NIH maintains extensive fact sheet libraries. The DSLD tracks label data. Academic research accumulates in journals. But this information lives in PDFs, government websites, and paywalled databases. Nobody has compressed it into structured, machine-readable objects that apps can query in real-time with a developer-friendly experience.
4. Consumers Already Love Scanners
This is the proof point that matters most.
Yuka, the food and cosmetics scanner, now serves 55-60 million users across 12 countries, with the U.S. as its fastest-growing market (Yuka). The app routinely tops health/fitness app store charts. It translates barcodes into color-coded health scores and has driven manufacturers to reformulate products. French supermarket chain Intermarché changed 1,100 products and removed 142 additives specifically because of Yuka ratings.
This is the playbook. The behavior is proven. People want to scan, understand, and make better decisions at the point of purchase. Nobody has built the definitive, developer-friendly version for supplements.
The Contrarian Insight: Labels Aren't the Moat
If you try to "own the supplement database," you're competing with the NIH. They don't need to make money. You can't out-government the government on data collection.
The leverage sits higher up the stack.
Vault-only access.
Join founders who spot opportunities ahead of the crowd. Actionable insights. Zero fluff.
“Intelligent, bold, minus the pretense.”
“Like discovering the cheat codes of the startup world.”
“SH is off-Broadway for founders — weird, sharp, and ahead of the curve.”
